• 关节镜下经皮复位内固定治疗胫骨平台骨折疗效分析
  • Clinical Efficacy of Arthroscopic Percutaneous Reduction and Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fracture
  • 陈铎允,孙秀钦.关节镜下经皮复位内固定治疗胫骨平台骨折疗效分析[J].中国烧伤创疡杂志,2024,(5):391~395.
    DOI:
    中文关键词:  关节镜下经皮复位内固定  胫骨平台骨折  膝关节功能  应激  不良事件
    英文关键词:Arthroscopic percutaneous reduction and internal fixation  Tibial plateau fracture  Knee joint function  Stress  Adverse events
    基金项目:
    作者单位
    陈铎允 473005 河南 南阳, 南阳市中心医院骨科 
    孙秀钦  
    摘要点击次数: 78
    全文下载次数: 179
    中文摘要:
          【摘要】 目的 探讨胫骨平台骨折患者采用关节镜下经皮复位内固定治疗的临床效果。方法 选取 2020 年6 月至 2022 年 6 月南阳市中心医院收治的86例胫骨平台骨折患者作为研究对象, 根据不同治疗方法将其分为关节镜组(51例) 和切开复位组(35例), 关节镜组患者行关节镜下经皮复位内固定治疗, 切开复位组患者行切开复位内固定治疗, 对比观察两组患者围手术期相关指标、骨折线消失时间、应激水平、膝关节功能以及不良事件发生情况。结果 关节镜组患者术中出血量明显少于切开复位组 ( t = 29.134, P<0.001), 手术时间、首次下床时间、住院时间及骨折线消失时间均明显短于切开复位组 ( t = 9.732、14.734、9.534、5.071, P 均<0.001);术后 1 d, 关节镜组患者神经肽Y (NPY)、前列腺素E2 ( PGE2 )水平均明显低于切开复位组 ( t = 11.705、11.248, P 均<0.001); 术后6个月, 关节镜组患者国际膝关节文献委员会膝关节评估表 ( IKDC) 评分明显高于切开复位组 (t = 5.744, P<0.001), 膝关节内旋、外旋、屈曲活动度均明显大于切开复位组 ( t = 10.604、7.106?7.052, P 均<0.001); 关节镜组患者不良事件发生率为 5.88%, 明显低于切开复位组患者的不良事件发生率20.00% (χ2 = 4.026, P= 0.045)?结论 胫骨平台骨折患者采用关节镜下经皮复位内固定治疗的创伤更小, 术后患者应激反应更轻、不良事件发生率更低, 更有利于膝关节功能恢复。
    英文摘要:
          【Abstract】 Objective To study the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic percutaneous reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of patients with tibial plateau fracture. Methods 86 patients with tibial plateau fracture, admitted to Nanyang Central Hospital from June 2020 to June 2022, were enrolled as research subjects and divided into the arthroscopy group (n = 51) and the open reduction group ( n = 35) according to the different treatment methods. Patients in the arthroscopy group were treated with arthroscopic percutaneous reduction and internal fixation, whereas patients in the open reduction group were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Perioperative indicators, fracture line disappearance time, stress levels, knee joint function, and occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss in the arthroscopy group was significantly less than that in the open reduction group (t = 29.134,P<0.001). The operation time, first off?bed time, length of stay and fracture line disappearance time were all significantlyshorter in the arthroscopy group compared with the open reduction group ( t = 9.732, 14.734, 9.534 and 5.071, all P<0.001). On day 1 after operation, the levels of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2 ) in the arthroscopy group were significantly lower than those in the open reduction group (t = 11.705 and 11.248, both P<0.001). On month 6 after operation, the International Knee Documentation Committee knee evaluation form ( IKDC) scores in the arthroscopy group were significantly higher than those in the open reduction group ( t = 5.744, P<0.001). The degrees of knee joint internal rotation, external rotation, and flexion range of motion were all significantly greater in the arthroscopy group (t = 10.604, 7.106 and 7.052, all P<0.001). The occurrence of adverse events of patients in the arthroscopy group was 5.88%, significantly lower than the corresponding 20.00% in the open reduction group ( χ2 = 4.026, P = 0.045) .Conclusion In the treatment of tibial plateau fracture, the therapy of arthroscopic percutaneous reduction and internal fixation, being less invasive, results in milder postoperative stress response and lower occurrence of adverse events, and is more conducive for the recovery of patients’ knee joint function.